Drake Sues Universal Music Group And Spotify Over Lamar’s Track
Drake’s company, Frozen Moments LLC, has taken Universal Music Group (UMG) and Spotify to court. They claim UMG made Kendrick Lamar’s song “Not Like Us” seem more popular than it is. This happened on Spotify, where the song has over 900 million plays.
Drake’s team says UMG used tricks like bots and pay-to-play deals to make the song go viral. They also claim UMG paid Spotify less than usual for the song. This was in exchange for more song recommendations to users.
UMG says they act with high ethics in their marketing. Spotify hasn’t commented yet. But they’ve talked about how they check for fake streaming on their platform.
Key Takeaways
- Drake’s company Frozen Moments LLC filed a lawsuit against Universal Music Group and Spotify, alleging they inflated the popularity of Kendrick Lamar’s song “Not Like Us” on Spotify.
- The lawsuit claims UMG used bots, pay-to-play agreements, and offered Spotify a 30% discount on licensing fees to boost the song’s popularity.
- UMG denies the allegations, stating they use ethical practices in their marketing and promotions.
- Spotify has not commented, but has previously invested in measures to prevent artificial streaming impacts on its platform.
- The legal action marks a significant escalation in the ongoing feud between Drake and Kendrick Lamar, two of the biggest names in hip-hop.
Legal Battle Unfolds: Drake’s Allegations Against UMG and Spotify
The music feud between Drake and Kendrick Lamar has escalated. Drake’s company, Frozen Moments LLC, has sued Universal Music Group (UMG) and Spotify. They claim these companies worked together to change streaming data for Lamar’s song “Not Like Us.”
This lawsuit reveals a complex scheme. It aims to hurt Drake’s music career. It’s a big deal in the music world.
Details of the New York Court Filing
Drake wants to keep and share evidence for his case. He says UMG used bots and paid radio stations to make “Not Like Us” more popular. They also used social media influencers.
Key Claims in Drake’s Petition
- UMG offered Spotify special rates to play “Not Like Us” more.
- UMG used bots to make it seem like more people were listening.
- They made it easier to find Lamar’s music, making “Not Like Us” more popular.
UMG’s Initial Response to Accusations
UMG denies any wrong doing. They call Drake’s claims “offensive and untrue.” They say they follow the highest ethical standards in promoting music.
This legal fight could change the music industry. It could make things more transparent and fair. This could help artists and fans alike.
The Controversial “Not Like Us” Track’s Success
The feud between Kendrick Lamar and Drake has turned legal. Drake’s company, Frozen Moments LLC, has filed a lawsuit in New York. They accuse Spotify and Universal Music Group (UMG) of boosting “Not Like Us” streaming numbers unfairly.
UMG is accused of using deceitful tactics to make “Not Like Us” more popular. The song, with lyrics aimed at Drake, reached number one on the Billboard Hot 100. It has also gotten over 900 million plays on Spotify.
This legal fight highlights the intense rivalry between Lamar and Drake. They have exchanged diss tracks, with “Not Like Us” being the latest. Drake claims UMG and Spotify used bots and pay-to-play agreements to inflate the song’s success.
UMG denies these claims, saying they follow ethical marketing practices. But the lawsuit suggests UMG might have fired Drake’s loyal employees to hide their actions.
The success of “Not Like Us” has made the feud between Lamar and Drake even more intense. The legal battle will likely affect the streaming platforms and the music industry’s practices.
“The feud between Drake and Kendrick Lamar is considered one of the biggest in recent hip-hop history.”
Drake Sues Universal Music Group And Spotify Over Lamar’s Track
Popular rapper Drake has filed a lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG) and Spotify. He claims they worked together to make Kendrick Lamar’s song “Not Like Us” seem more popular. The song has gotten over 900 million plays on Spotify, leading to suspicions of streaming fraud and bot manipulation.
Evidence of Alleged Stream Manipulation
Drake’s team says UMG tried to make “Not Like Us” more popular. They claim the label used bots and pay-to-play deals with influencers. Drake also says UMG paid Apple to send users to “Not Like Us” when they asked Siri for his album.
Claims of Bot Usage and Pay-to-Play Agreements
The lawsuit also talks about UMG’s pay-to-play deals with radio stations and influencers. Drake’s team says these deals were to make “Not Like Us” seem more popular. They claim these actions broke the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act.
Spotify’s Platform Integrity Measures
Spotify says it works hard to stop fake streaming on its platform. The company hasn’t said much about the lawsuit between Drake, UMG, and Kendrick Lamar’s song.
This lawsuit shows the tough issues in the music industry. It’s about keeping things fair for artists and streaming services. The fight between Drake and Kendrick Lamar could change the music world a lot.
History of Drake and Kendrick Lamar’s Relationship
Drake and Kendrick Lamar are two huge names in hip-hop with a complex history. They were once friends, working together under Universal Music Group. But things changed in 2013 when Lamar started criticizing Drake, starting a hip-hop rivalry.
The rap feud grew bigger in early 2024. Both artists released diss tracks filled with insults. Lamar’s “Not Like Us” was the peak, leading to a legal fight between Drake and UMG. This feud has grabbed the music world’s attention, making it one of the biggest hip-hop rivalries today.
Even though they’ve worked together before, their relationship is now all about competition. The release of “Not Like Us” and Drake’s lawsuit against UMG and Spotify have raised the stakes. Fans and the music industry are watching closely to see how this hip-hop rivalry will end.
Universal Music Group’s Business Practices Under Scrutiny
The legal fight between Drake and Universal Music Group (UMG) has highlighted the music industry’s complex ways. Drake says UMG used questionable tactics like firing employees seen as loyal to him. This was to hide their alleged wrongdoings.
Drake also claims UMG has a close deal with Spotify. They gave Spotify a 30% discount on Kendrick Lamar’s song “Not Like Us” for more promotion. This has raised big questions about the ethics of music industry corporate practices.
Licensing Agreement Controversies
Drake’s claims have also brought up issues with licensing agreements. He says UMG used bots and pay-to-play agreements to change streaming and airplay. This could harm Drake’s music and the whole music industry’s licensing and distribution ecosystem.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| UMG’s Estimated Spotify Revenues in 2023 | $2.3 billion |
| Discount Offered to Spotify for “Not Like Us” | 30% |
| Alleged Fake Streams for “Not Like Us” on Spotify | 30 million |
| Single-Day Streams for “Not Like Us” | 900 million |
UMG’s corporate practices, artist relations, and licensing deals are now under close watch. The ongoing legal battle could change how the ethics and transparency of the music industry are viewed.
Impact on the Music Industry and Streaming Platform Integrity
The legal fight between Drake and Universal Music Group (UMG) brings up big questions. It’s about the trustworthiness of streaming sites and the music world. Drake’s claim points to possible cheating in streaming numbers and rankings, which can change an artist’s success and money.
This case might make streaming sites check their methods more closely. It could also start talks about fairness and openness in how music is promoted and shared by big record labels.
Drake says UMG faked 30 million streams for Kendrick Lamar’s song, ‘Not Like Us’, on Spotify quickly. UMG is accused of secretly paying for song boosts on platforms and radio. This makes people wonder if streaming numbers are real and if music charts are fair.
The lawsuit also talks about the unfairness in artist competition and the harm of fake promotion. Drake’s team might sue UMG for fraud and racketeering, which could change how artists deal with big labels and streaming sites.
This legal fight touches on big music industry issues like honesty, trust, and what success means today. Fans and music pros are watching closely. This case could change the rules for streaming authenticity, music industry standards, artist competition, and platform transparency.
“This lawsuit paves the way for potential changes in industry standards regarding artist rivalry, promotion, and the credibility of streaming metrics.”
Conclusion
The fight between Drake and Universal Music Group (UMG), with Spotify involved, is a big deal in music. It highlights possible problems with music streaming and the ties between artists, labels, and online platforms. The case’s outcome could change how the industry works, including contracts and fair competition in streaming.
Drake’s claims, if true, could bring big changes to music in the digital world. The case might make the industry more open, fair in contracts, and honest about streaming. It could also help artists fight for their rights and get better deals from those who handle their music.
The end result of this battle between Drake and UMG, with Spotify, will affect the future of streaming. How well the industry responds to these issues will be key. It will help keep fans’ trust and support the talents of artists.
FAQ
What is the legal dispute between Drake and Universal Music Group (UMG) and Spotify?
Drake’s company, Frozen Moments LLC, has sued UMG in a New York court. They claim UMG made Kendrick Lamar’s song “Not Like Us” seem more popular than it is. Drake says UMG used bots and pay-to-play deals to do this.
What are the key claims made in Drake’s petition?
Drake says UMG used bots to make “Not Like Us” seem more popular. They also claim UMG paid influencers and radio stations to play the song. Drake believes UMG tried to make his own music less popular on platforms like Apple Music.
How has UMG responded to Drake’s allegations?
UMG denies Drake’s claims, calling them “offensive and untrue.” They say they follow the highest ethical standards in their marketing and promotions.
What is the success story of Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us” track?
“Not Like Us” by Kendrick Lamar has been a huge hit. It reached number one on the Billboard Hot 100 and has over 900 million plays on Spotify. Drake’s allegations center around this song’s popularity.
What is the history behind the feud between Drake and Kendrick Lamar?
Drake and Kendrick Lamar were once friends but started to argue in 2013. Lamar began criticizing Drake publicly. The feud got worse in early 2024, with both artists releasing songs with insults.
How could this legal battle impact the music industry and streaming platform integrity?
This case makes people question the fairness of streaming platforms and the music industry. Drake’s lawsuit points out how streaming numbers can be manipulated. This could lead to more checks on streaming platforms and discussions about fairness in music promotion.
GT Squad, IPL 2025 Auction Day 2 Live: Gujarat Titans full list of players bought and purse remainin